Severin v. Benenati

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Severin v. Benenati

251 A.D.2d 316, 673 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6296

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 251 A.D.2d 316 (Severin v. Benenati) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Severin v. Benenati, 251 A.D.2d 316, 673 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6296 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, on the ground, inter alia, of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated April 29, 1997, which, upon a jury verdict finding him 40% at fault in the happening of the accident and finding that he suffered total damages in the amount of $75,000, is in his favor in the principal sum of only $45,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The jury’s award of damages for the plaintiff’s torn rotator [317]*317cuff injury did not deviate from what would be reasonable compensation (CPLR 5501 [c]; see, Sescila v Garine, 225 AD2d 684).

The plaintiff’s remaining contention is without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, on the ground, inter alia, of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated April 29, 1997, which, upon a jury verdict finding him 40% at fault in the happening of the accident and finding that he suffered total damages in the amount of $75,000, is in his favor in the principal sum of only $45,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The jury’s award of damages for the plaintiff’s torn rotator [317]*317cuff injury did not deviate from what would be reasonable compensation (CPLR 5501 [c]; see, Sescila v Garine, 225 AD2d 684).

The plaintiff’s remaining contention is without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D.2d 316, 673 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/severin-v-benenati-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack