Severance v. Severance
This text of 183 N.E. 909 (Severance v. Severance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The provision of the final judgment of divorce “ directing payments of money for the support of the plaintiff ” (Civ. Pr. Act, § 1159) should be stricken out, the plaintiff having remarried, but without prejudice to the right of the plaintiff to seek relief under the provisions of the contract of December 12,1925. We express no opinion as to her right to support under such contract.
The order should be modified in accordance with this opinion and as so modified affirmed, without costs.
Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien, ILubbs and Crouch, JJ., concur.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
183 N.E. 909, 260 N.Y. 432, 1933 N.Y. LEXIS 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/severance-v-severance-ny-1933.