Sevenair v. Grasselli Chemical Co.

155 A. 371, 9 N.J. Misc. 656, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 263
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 19, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 155 A. 371 (Sevenair v. Grasselli Chemical Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sevenair v. Grasselli Chemical Co., 155 A. 371, 9 N.J. Misc. 656, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 263 (N.J. 1931).

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

This is defendants’ rule to show cause why the verdicts should not be set aside as excessive. The plaintiff wife has a verdict for $11,000, and plaintiff husband has a verdict for $4,000.

We conclude that the verdict for the plaintiff wife, Jean Sevenair, is excessive.

If plaintiff Jean Sevenair will, within twenty days from the entry of an order hereunder, consent to a reduction of her verdict'to $9,000, the present rule will be discharged, otherwise the rule will be made absolute as to her, and a new trial granted as to damages only. The rule to show cause will be' discharged as to plaintiff Albert Sevenair.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 A. 371, 9 N.J. Misc. 656, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sevenair-v-grasselli-chemical-co-nj-1931.