Seven-Thousand Eight-Hundred Twenty-Six Dollars in United States Currency v. State

Texas Supreme Court·Decided October 10, 2016·No. 03-16-00089-CV·Published

Opinion

iWOTXoM FAR £M B>ftAlg-^co/vlC^]>^flT^^ Ho. C8-lfe- 000^9 -CV

October 10, 2016

Om^ or APfeAlS

t>g>tU^ cx,a& -z-e-to Ge^-U j^ Ijj.g, CjuUiA-e^oy, I/,

^covs S1&&A.0M on ; saWvv ^^ ^^ *3a*NP* Uct\N\ 3bK&M^^

^received\

OCT 1 0 2018

JHIRDCOURTOFAPPEALS y

3.^1^ C^uvf^ op\^«m u^lV cxec&e c&^wtf*^

<5

ct p/vese/vNi-w-eol-" fe4«.t;\£vY\e/*vir c^Wa^ >o HK\/\ Rale 32^Q>), ^KP'ves*!*} fe^utAcVi* ^^^5 §o<s>$one*r{

\a /18l b^ -f&* Texas* Su.p/u?w<2 U4^.&ec;i *^*W

i/, W\^A.ccu^^\g fvta.-v'A. Banvc 703 5iO. M> 3£~£

i

9r^>uDX-V-V C?7I ^-^. gj£ 31 CTeyO l^^).

CoolaV pr\<e.<L,e<$e>vcU ^n Si-rig ck-fc>e-cA ,t^ CsuaV YY\oV©<A <WciJ ^^^^U\ V£ S-S-V £,D/Vf&\ ^GLC^-S oA\ck, jp. -^ruxe, ui<s>o^V4 f\^_9«v.V-e \ <\ Ve^^Vv oaa4 fiTLCenrcCousW

dg_c^v \ ( \-W S<ukj(*JV-e>vwe Gata.^4-^ 7A .H-e^A^ ^ -to +&**." 1^1 o^e^l «*wU Vo (U*e 3>aqCb)

S"ll,0'3.

^

Foa i-V^«s< r^ds&^s^ tOc^i^^A f\e<?u,^s-f^

Fi^O SB

-*•( 5-3^077

t^*s -s*^ v/ia. as. yvw<1 Vo ScLoit x-*\\o£ji*o 6<?-^oe clV 9.0, Sox 17H-8 , Au^fC^ V* -7?7<5?

fO-7-lt

Re*. 103 "lip- 000<?7~CV

C/i &av\c_ K-e co^s.'fea^^. /}- Copy lus k-ee^

^r<:7£o7 7

^RECEIVED\

OCT 1 0 2016

vTWRDCOURTOFAPPEALS

\ JEFFREVq KY|F ^

AUSTIK

RIO GRANDE DI

07 OCT 20X6 F

?87i i— 2=?4747 ,|„l,IJ.,l|.|l|l|//ll.|.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seven-Thousand Eight-Hundred Twenty-Six Dollars in United States Currency v. State, (Tex. 2016).

Seven-Thousand Eight-Hundred Twenty-Six Dollars in United States Currency v. State (Seven-Thousand Eight-Hundred Twenty-Six Dollars in United States Currency v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.