Seven-Thousand Eight-Hundred Twenty-Six Dollars in United States Currency v. State
Opinion
iWOTXoM FAR £M B>ftAlg-^co/vlC^]>^flT^^ Ho. C8-lfe- 000^9 -CV
October 10, 2016
Om^ or APfeAlS
t>g>tU^ cx,a& -z-e-to Ge^-U j^ Ijj.g, CjuUiA-e^oy, I/,
^covs S1&&A.0M on ; saWvv ^^ ^^ *3a*NP* Uct\N\ 3bK&M^^
^received\
OCT 1 0 2018
JHIRDCOURTOFAPPEALS y
3.^1^ C^uvf^ op\^«m u^lV cxec&e c&^wtf*^
<5
ct p/vese/vNi-w-eol-" fe4«.t;\£vY\e/*vir c^Wa^ >o HK\/\ Rale 32^Q>), ^KP'ves*!*} fe^utAcVi* ^^^5 §o<s>$one*r{
\a /18l b^ -f&* Texas* Su.p/u?w<2 U4^.&ec;i *^*W
i/, W\^A.ccu^^\g fvta.-v'A. Banvc 703 5iO. M> 3£~£
i
9r^>uDX-V-V C?7I ^-^. gj£ 31 CTeyO l^^).
CoolaV pr\<e.<L,e<$e>vcU ^n Si-rig ck-fc>e-cA ,t^ CsuaV YY\oV©<A <WciJ ^^^^U\ V£ S-S-V £,D/Vf&\ ^GLC^-S oA\ck, jp. -^ruxe, ui<s>o^V4 f\^_9«v.V-e \ <\ Ve^^Vv oaa4 fiTLCenrcCousW
dg_c^v \ ( \-W S<ukj(*JV-e>vwe Gata.^4-^ 7A .H-e^A^ ^ -to +&**." 1^1 o^e^l «*wU Vo (U*e 3>aqCb)
S"ll,0'3.
^
Foa i-V^«s< r^ds&^s^ tOc^i^^A f\e<?u,^s-f^
Fi^O SB
-*•( 5-3^077
t^*s -s*^ v/ia. as. yvw<1 Vo ScLoit x-*\\o£ji*o 6<?-^oe clV 9.0, Sox 17H-8 , Au^fC^ V* -7?7<5?
fO-7-lt
Re*. 103 "lip- 000<?7~CV
C/i &av\c_ K-e co^s.'fea^^. /}- Copy lus k-ee^
^r<:7£o7 7
^RECEIVED\
OCT 1 0 2016
vTWRDCOURTOFAPPEALS
\ JEFFREVq KY|F ^
AUSTIK
RIO GRANDE DI
07 OCT 20X6 F
?87i i— 2=?4747 ,|„l,IJ.,l|.|l|l|//ll.|.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Seven-Thousand Eight-Hundred Twenty-Six Dollars in United States Currency v. State (Seven-Thousand Eight-Hundred Twenty-Six Dollars in United States Currency v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.