Seven Park Avenue Corp. v. Green

277 A.D.2d 123, 715 N.Y.S.2d 697, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12126
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 21, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 277 A.D.2d 123 (Seven Park Avenue Corp. v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seven Park Avenue Corp. v. Green, 277 A.D.2d 123, 715 N.Y.S.2d 697, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12126 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered May 17, 2000, upon the parties’ respective motions for summary judgment, inter alia, declaring that defendant tenant’s installation of a half bath in his apartment was a breach of his proprietary lease with plaintiff cooperative housing corporation, and permanently enjoining defendant to remove such installation, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Since paragraph 21 of the proprietary lease plainly states that consent for alteration of “pipes” or “plumbing fixtures,” among other things, “shall not be unreasonably withheld,” plaintiffs denial of defendant’s supplemental application to install the half bath was “not sheltered from review by the business judgment rule” (Rosenthal v One Hudson Park, 269 AD2d 144, 145). Accordingly, the trial court properly concluded that a trial was needed to determine whether plaintiffs action was in fact “reasonable,” i.e., “legitimately related to the welfare of the cooperative” (id.).

The trial evidence, viewed in a light favorable to the prevailing party (see, Thoreson v Penthouse Intl., 80 NY2d 490, 495), supports the court’s conclusion that plaintiffs board’s denial of permission to complete the half bath was reasonable, based on [124]*124concern for a possible adverse impact on the building’s plumbing infrastructure, longstanding board policy and a reluctance to set a precedent for similar applications. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perrault v. Village Dunes Apt. Corp.
2018 NY Slip Op 5878 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Wiener v. 150 West End Owners Corp.
298 A.D.2d 385 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 A.D.2d 123, 715 N.Y.S.2d 697, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seven-park-avenue-corp-v-green-nyappdiv-2000.