Seven Hickory v. Ellery

Supreme Court

Seven Hickory v. Ellery

103 U.S. 423, 26 L. Ed. 435, 1880 U.S. LEXIS 2133

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 14, 1881

Docket1115

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 103 U.S. 423 (Seven Hickory v. Ellery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seven Hickory v. Ellery, 103 U.S. 423, 26 L. Ed. 435, 1880 U.S. LEXIS 2133 (1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

The single question we have now to consider is whether a bill passed by both Houses, and presented to the governor before the legislature adjourns, becomes a law when signed by the governor after the session of the legislature has been terminated by an adjournment, but within ten days from its presentation to him. We have no hesitation in saying it does. There is certainly no express provision of the Constitution to the contrary. All that instrument requires is that, before any bill, which has passed the two Houses,, can become a law, it shall be presented to the governor. If he approves it, he may sign it. If he does sign, it within the time, the bill becomes a law. That is not said in so many words, but is manifestly implied. After a bill has been signed, the legislature has nothing more to do • with it. Undoubtedly,, if the legislature should be in session when the signing is done, it would not be inappropriate for the governor to communicate his approval to one or both the Houses; but there is nothing in the Constitution which requires him to do'so. The filing of the bill by the governor in the office ■ of the secretary of state with his signature of approval *425 on it is just as effectual in giving it validity as a law, as its formal return to the legislature would be. The bill becomes a law when signed. Everything done after that is with a view to preserving the evidence of its passage and approval.

. The other parts of the article of the Constitution under consideration relate only to what is to be done if thé governor fails-to indicate his approval of the bill by signing it. - If the legislature continues in session and he positively disapproves the bill, he may, within ten days from the time of its presentation, to him, return it with his objections to the House in which-it' originated. Under such circumstances the bill cannot become a law until it has again passed both Houses, and this time by a majority of all the members elected. Such a second passage, if secured and entered on the journal, makes the bill a law notwithstanding its disapproval by the governor. If the governor remains passive, and neither signs nor returns the bill within ten days, the legislature being at the time in session, it becomes a law without his approval.

In .this way provision is made for every case that can arise, except when the governor fails to sign the bill and the legislature adjourns for the session before the expiration of the ten days. . To meet such a state of things it was provided that the governor might return the bill with his objections on the first day of the next session, and that, if he did not, the bill'-was then to become a law. If he did, the bill must again be passed over his objections as in case of a return before an adjournment and within the ten days. If thus passed it became a law, otherwise not., So that, under the Constitution of Illinois, if a bill is passed by both Houses of the legislature it becomes a law, — 1, when approved and signed by the governor within ten days after its presentation to him2, when the legislature being in session, the governor fails to sign the bill or return it with his objections to the House in which it originated within the ten days ; 8, when, after being returned within the ten days, it is passed by the requisite majorities over his objections; 4, when, if the session of the legislature terminates by an adjournment before the expiration of the ten days, he fails to return the bill with bis objections the first day of the next session; and, 5, when, having returned it with objections on the first day of the *426 next session, it is again passed by tbe requisite majorities in botb Houses. And it becomes a law at tbe time wben tbe event happens wbicb is to give it validity. In tbe present case tbe bill was approved and signed witbin tbe ten days, and, therefore, as we think, if became a law from tbe date of tbe approval, notwithstanding tbe legislature was not in session at tbe time. This is in accordance with tbe ruling of tbe Court of Appeals of New York in The People v. Bowen (21 N. Y. 517); of tbe Supreme Court of Louisiana in State, ex rel. Belden, Attorney-General, v. Fagan (22 La. Ann. 545), and of tbe Supreme Court of Georgia in Solomon v. Commissioners of Cartersville (41 Ga. 157), upon provisions somewhat similar in tbe constitutions of those States. In tbe last case tbe decision was put on tbe ground that tbe practice of tbe governor had been to sign tbe bills witbin tbe limited time, whether tbe legislature was in session or not, but not afterwards. Tbe bill of exceptions in the present case shows that tbe practice in Illinois has been to sign after tbe legislature bad adjourned.

In every view of the case, we think tbe judgment below was right, and it is consequently

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

The single question we have now to consider is whether a bill passed by both Houses, and presented to the governor before the legislature adjourns, becomes a law when signed by the governor after the session of the legislature has been terminated by an adjournment, but within ten days from its presentation to him. We have no hesitation in saying it does. There is certainly no express provision of the Constitution to the contrary. All that instrument requires is that, before any bill, which has passed the two Houses,, can become a law, it shall be presented to the governor. If he approves it, he may sign it. If he does sign, it within the time, the bill becomes a law. That is not said in so many words, but is manifestly implied. After a bill has been signed, the legislature has nothing more to do • with it. Undoubtedly,, if the legislature should be in session when the signing is done, it would not be inappropriate for the governor to communicate his approval to one or both the Houses; but there is nothing in the Constitution which requires him to do'so. The filing of the bill by the governor in the office ■ of the secretary of state with his signature of approval *425 on it is just as effectual in giving it validity as a law, as its formal return to the legislature would be. The bill becomes a law when signed. Everything done after that is with a view to preserving the evidence of its passage and approval.

. The other parts of the article of the Constitution under consideration relate only to what is to be done if thé governor fails-to indicate his approval of the bill by signing it. - If the legislature continues in session and he positively disapproves the bill, he may, within ten days from the time of its presentation, to him, return it with his objections to the House in which-it' originated. Under such circumstances the bill cannot become a law until it has again passed both Houses, and this time by a majority of all the members elected. Such a second passage, if secured and entered on the journal, makes the bill a law notwithstanding its disapproval by the governor. If the governor remains passive, and neither signs nor returns the bill within ten days, the legislature being at the time in session, it becomes a law without his approval.

In .this way provision is made for every case that can arise, except when the governor fails to sign the bill and the legislature adjourns for the session before the expiration of the ten days. . To meet such a state of things it was provided that the governor might return the bill with his objections on the first day of the next session, and that, if he did not, the bill'-was then to become a law. If he did, the bill must again be passed over his objections as in case of a return before an adjournment and within the ten days. If thus passed it became a law, otherwise not., So that, under the Constitution of Illinois, if a bill is passed by both Houses of the legislature it becomes a law, — 1, when approved and signed by the governor within ten days after its presentation to him2, when the legislature being in session, the governor fails to sign the bill or return it with his objections to the House in which it originated within the ten days ; 8, when, after being returned within the ten days, it is passed by the requisite majorities over his objections; 4, when, if the session of the legislature terminates by an adjournment before the expiration of the ten days, he fails to return the bill with bis objections the first day of the next session; and, 5, when, having returned it with objections on the first day of the *426 next session, it is again passed by tbe requisite majorities in botb Houses. And it becomes a law at tbe time wben tbe event happens wbicb is to give it validity. In tbe present case tbe bill was approved and signed witbin tbe ten days, and, therefore, as we think, if became a law from tbe date of tbe approval, notwithstanding tbe legislature was not in session at tbe time. This is in accordance with tbe ruling of tbe Court of Appeals of New York in The People v. Bowen (21 N. Y. 517); of tbe Supreme Court of Louisiana in State, ex rel. Belden, Attorney-General, v. Fagan (22 La. Ann. 545), and of tbe Supreme Court of Georgia in Solomon v. Commissioners of Cartersville (41 Ga. 157), upon provisions somewhat similar in tbe constitutions of those States. In tbe last case tbe decision was put on tbe ground that tbe practice of tbe governor had been to sign tbe bills witbin tbe limited time, whether tbe legislature was in session or not, but not afterwards. Tbe bill of exceptions in the present case shows that tbe practice in Illinois has been to sign after tbe legislature bad adjourned.

In every view of the case, we think tbe judgment below was right, and it is consequently

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 U.S. 423, 26 L. Ed. 435, 1880 U.S. LEXIS 2133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seven-hickory-v-ellery-scotus-1881.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack