Seven Continents Global Expeditionary Operations v. Weir

CourtDistrict Court, D. Utah
DecidedMarch 11, 2024
Docket4:23-cv-00005
StatusUnknown

This text of Seven Continents Global Expeditionary Operations v. Weir (Seven Continents Global Expeditionary Operations v. Weir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seven Continents Global Expeditionary Operations v. Weir, (D. Utah 2024).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH – SOUTHERN DIVISION SEVEN CONTINENTS GLOBAL EXPEDITIONARY OPERATIONS, LLC, a MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Delaware limited liability company; and DENYING PLAINTFFS’ MOTION TO TOMMY L. ALLEN, a Utah resident; COMPEL MEDIATION Plaintiffs, vs. Case No.: 4:23-cv-00005 STEAPHAN WEIR, a California resident; JANE AND JOHN DOES 1-10; and DOE District Judge David Nuffer BUSINESS ENTITIES 1-10; Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler Defendants. STEAPHAN WEIR, an individual,

Cross-Claimant, vs.

SEVEN CONTINENTS GLOBAL EXPEDITIONARY OPERATIONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and TOMMY L. ALLEN, an individual; and ROES 1 through 25, inclusive.

Cross-Defendants

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Mediation.1 Whether to compel mediation is within the district court’s discretion.2 The Court “has authorization by local rule and [its] inherent authority to order mediation as a way of managing the litigation before

1 Docket No. 31, filed December 11, 2023. 2 See Pierce v. Underwood, 487 U.S. 552, 559 n.1 (1988). it.”> “Of course, a district court’s inherent powers are not infinite.”4 Inherent powers must be used in a way reasonably suited to the enhancement of the Court’s processes; exercised in a manner that comports with applicable statutes, rules, and procedural fairness; and used with restraint and discretion.> When mediation is forced upon unwilling litigants, it stands to reason that the likelihood of settlement is diminished.° Requiring parties to invest substantial amounts of time and money in mediation under such circumstances may well be inefficient.’ Given the procedural posture of this case, including the recent withdrawal of counsel for Defendant Weir, the Court finds that mediation will not be beneficial at this time. It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Mediation (Docket No. 31) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DATED this 11th day of March, 2024. BY THE\COURY:

Pete — HAUL KOHLER nited States Magistrate Judge

> United States y. Ridley’s Family Mkts., Inc., 525 F. Supp. 3d 1355, 1357 (D. Utah. 2021); see also In re Alt. Pipe Corp., 304 F.3d 135, 143 (1st Cir. 2002). * In re Alt. Pipe Corp., 304 F.3d at 143. > Td. 6 Ridley’s Family Mkts., 525 F. Supp. at 1357-58. 7 Id. at 1358.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pierce v. Underwood
487 U.S. 552 (Supreme Court, 1988)
In Re Atlantic Pipe Corp.
304 F.3d 135 (First Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Seven Continents Global Expeditionary Operations v. Weir, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seven-continents-global-expeditionary-operations-v-weir-utd-2024.