Seubert v. Scott

164 N.W. 75, 39 S.D. 278, 1917 S.D. LEXIS 145
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 23, 1917
DocketFile No. 4115
StatusPublished

This text of 164 N.W. 75 (Seubert v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seubert v. Scott, 164 N.W. 75, 39 S.D. 278, 1917 S.D. LEXIS 145 (S.D. 1917).

Opinion

GATES, P. J.

Action by a judgment creditor of a corporation to collect from alleged stockholders who- had not paid f'01* their stock. Judgment for defendants. From the judgment, and an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

[1] The trial court found that defendants subscribed for stock in the corporation upon the condition that it should not be issued, delivered, or paid for until one Fawick obtained a patent for a transmission for a tractor engine and had transferred the patent to the corporation, which condition never accrued. Certificates of stock were made out to the defendants, and remained undetached from the corporate stockbook, and were never delivered. The defendants, therefore, never -became de jure stockholder in the corporation.

[2]. There is nothing in the record tending to show that they held themselves out to plaintiff to be stockholders at the time the indebtedness was incurred for which his - judgment was rendered, if at any time; therefore there is nothing tending to show that they should be held to be -de facto stockholders, and as such liable to-creditors- of the corporation. Randall Printing Co. v. Sanitas Mineral Water Co., 120 Minn. 268, 139 N. W. 606, 43 L. R. A. (N. S.) 706.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Randall Printing Co. v. Sanitas Mineral Water Co.
139 N.W. 606 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 N.W. 75, 39 S.D. 278, 1917 S.D. LEXIS 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seubert-v-scott-sd-1917.