Settles v. Cotton's Admr.
This text of 5 Ky. Op. 762 (Settles v. Cotton's Admr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
Without particularly disposing of other reasons for affirming the judgment, which have been urged by the counsel for the appellee, several of which seem to be sufficient, we must affirm the judgment, because, there being no bill of exceptions in the record, this court cannot know-what evidence was heard by the court and must presume, therefore, that the judgment was based on sufficient evidence.
Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Ky. Op. 762, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/settles-v-cottons-admr-kyctapp-1872.