Settineri v. DiCarlo

New York Court of Appeals

Settineri v. DiCarlo

624 N.E.2d 1034, 82 N.Y.2d 818

DecidedNovember 1, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 624 N.E.2d 1034 (Settineri v. DiCarlo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Settineri v. DiCarlo, 624 N.E.2d 1034, 82 N.Y.2d 818 (N.Y. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by petitioners Settineri et al., insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order which affirmed the denial of a motion to substitute counsel, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion [819]*819by petitioner Settineri et al. for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed as academic. Motion by proposed intervenor Bramwell for leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order which affirmed the denial of proposed intervenor Bramwell’s motion to intervene dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by petitioners Settineri et al., insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order which affirmed the denial of a motion to substitute counsel, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion [819]*819by petitioner Settineri et al. for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed as academic. Motion by proposed intervenor Bramwell for leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order which affirmed the denial of proposed intervenor Bramwell’s motion to intervene dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

624 N.E.2d 1034, 82 N.Y.2d 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/settineri-v-dicarlo-ny-1993.