Seton v. Hudson
This text of 1912 OK 409 (Seton v. Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case presents error from the county court of Pawnee county. October 8, 1909, the said, court rendered a joint judgment against the Arkansas Valley & Western Railway Company, the Arkansas Valley Townsite Company, H. C. Hanna, and Clark Seton, who were held liable upon a nonnegotiable promissory note. From an order of the court denying a motion of Clark Seton, one of the joint judgment debtors, to set aside the judgment entered, appeal has been lodged in this court.
The defendant in error now moves to dismiss the cause upon the ground of nonjoinder of proper parties. The record shows that the motion -which was denied was filed on behalf of defendant, Clark Seton, and time to make and serve case was granted to him alone, and the case-made was served upon the defendant in error, Frank Hudson, only, and that the time and *821 place of settling and signing the 'Case-made was not served upon nor waived by any of the other defendants. Hence it follows from the uniform holding of this court in a large number of cases that the motion to dismiss must be sustained. See Bullen v. Hudson et al., ante, 124 Pac. 1; Saunders et al. v. Mullen et al., ante, 119 Pac. 963, and cases therein cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1912 OK 409, 124 P. 1, 31 Okla. 820, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seton-v-hudson-okla-1912.