Setiawan v. Holder

398 F. App'x 181
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 28, 2010
Docket07-74577
StatusUnpublished

This text of 398 F. App'x 181 (Setiawan v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Setiawan v. Holder, 398 F. App'x 181 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Mohamad Setiawan, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Hoxha v. Ashcroft, 319 F.3d 1179,1182 n. 4 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of withholding of removal because Setiawan failed to demonstrate it is more likely than not he will be persecuted as a member of a particular social group comprised of Indonesians with United States citizen children. See id. at 1184-85.

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief because Setiawan failed to establish it is more likely than not he would be tortured if returned to Indonesia. See El Himri v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 932, 938 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
398 F. App'x 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/setiawan-v-holder-ca9-2010.