Sethy v. Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

YVETTE SETHY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and DARLENE GONZALEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. 23-cv-3452 (RA) Plaintiffs, ORDER v. VICTORIA’S SECRET STORES, LLC, Defendant.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled in principle. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 28, 2025 New York, New York Ae ( Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge