SETH TAYLOR v. STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 28, 2019
Docket18-1598
StatusPublished

This text of SETH TAYLOR v. STATE OF FLORIDA (SETH TAYLOR v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SETH TAYLOR v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

SETH TAYLOR, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1598 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed June 28, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; James Pierce, Acting Circuit Judge.

Terry P. Roberts of Law Office of Terry P. Roberts, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, Judge.

Seth Taylor appeals from the trial court's judgment of criminal contempt.

We do not doubt for an instant that the trial judge heard what he maintains he heard.

But we have read the official transcript and have repeatedly listened to the official

recording of the shelter hearing, and competent substantial evidence does not support a finding that it was Taylor who said it. See Almeida v. State, 737 So. 2d 520, 524 n.9

(Fla. 1999) (conducting an independent review of the transcript and tape of a custodial

interrogation, concluding that the audiotape "belied" one of the trial court's factual

findings, and recognizing that insofar as a ruling is based on a videotape or audiotape,

the trial court "has no special vantage point"); State v. Thompson, 193 So. 3d 916, 919

(Fla. 2d DCA 2016) ("An appellate court may independently review the audio recording

of an interview to assess whether competent, substantial evidence supports the trial

court's findings." (citing Cuervo v. State, 967 So. 2d 155, 160 (Fla. 2007))).

Accordingly, the judgment is reversed.

BLACK and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Almeida v. State
737 So. 2d 520 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Cuervo v. State
967 So. 2d 155 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)
State v. Thompson
193 So. 3d 916 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
SETH TAYLOR v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seth-taylor-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.