SETH S. BRIER v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 7, 2018
Docket17-2934
StatusPublished

This text of SETH S. BRIER v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY (SETH S. BRIER v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SETH S. BRIER v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

SETH S. BRIER, Appellant,

v.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR BCAP LLC TRUST 2007-AA2, AGRI SALES USA, INC., ATLAS PEAT & SOIL, INC., CEMEX, INC., HAMBLIN VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., OLYMPIA MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC., PALM BEACH NEWSPAPERS, INC., and WOOD MULCH PRODUCTS, INC. Appellees.

No. 4D17-2934

[February 7, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Howard H. Harrison, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2016-CA- 001600-XXXX-MB.

Henry B. Handler and David K. Friedman of Weiss, Handler & Cornwell, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant.

Sara F. Holladay-Tobias, Emily Y. Rottmann, and C.H. Houston III of McGuireWoods LLP, Jacksonville, for Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for BCAP LLC Trust 2007-AA2.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Appellee Deutsche Bank filed a complaint to foreclose on a mortgage. Appellant responded with an answer and eleven affirmative defenses, two of which were later stricken. The bank moved for summary judgment, addressing appellant’s remaining affirmative defenses only by generally claiming they lacked factual and legal support and were not pled with specificity. The trial court granted the bank’s motion. The bank has confessed error, stipulating that final summary judgment should be reversed. See Seale v. Regions Bank, 121 So. 3d 649, 650 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (“[I]n mortgage foreclosure cases, summary judgment is precluded if affirmative defenses are not factually refuted or shown to be legally insufficient.”). As such, we reverse and remand with instructions for the trial court to vacate the final judgment of foreclosure.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

GERBER, C.J., WARNER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seale v. Regions Bank
121 So. 3d 649 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
SETH S. BRIER v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seth-s-brier-v-deutsche-bank-national-trust-company-fladistctapp-2018.