Seth Gettys, Etc., in Error v. Silvan Newburger, Joseph Newburger
This text of 260 U.S. 693 (Seth Gettys, Etc., in Error v. Silvan Newburger, Joseph Newburger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
260 U.S. 693
43 S.Ct. 11
67 L.Ed. 467
Seth GETTYS et al., etc., plaintiffs in error,
v.
Silvan NEWBURGER, Joseph Newburger, et al.
No. 183.
Supreme Court of the United States
October 9, 1922
Messrs. W. A. Ledbetter, H. L. Stuart and R. R. Bell, all of Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Henry E. Asp, Henry G. Snyder, Frederick B. Owen, and Walter A. Lybrand, all of Oklahoma City, Okl., and Bernard Titche, of New Orleans, La., for defendants in error.
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U. S. 526, 530;1 Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569;2 Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720, 34 Sup. Ct. 892, 58 L. Ed. 1557; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147, 36 Sup. Ct. 97, 60 L. Ed. 186.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
260 U.S. 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seth-gettys-etc-in-error-v-silvan-newburger-joseph-newburger-scotus-1922.