Seth Bookout, Leslye Romero, and Ryan Gallagher v. Jonathan Shelley and Stedfast Baptist Church

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 23, 2022
Docket02-22-00055-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Seth Bookout, Leslye Romero, and Ryan Gallagher v. Jonathan Shelley and Stedfast Baptist Church (Seth Bookout, Leslye Romero, and Ryan Gallagher v. Jonathan Shelley and Stedfast Baptist Church) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seth Bookout, Leslye Romero, and Ryan Gallagher v. Jonathan Shelley and Stedfast Baptist Church, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth No. 02-22-00055-CV

SETH BOOKOUT, LESLYE ROMERO, § On Appeal from the 141st District AND RYAN GALLAGHER, Appellants Court

§ of Tarrant County (141-329494-21) V. § November 23, 2022 JONATHAN SHELLEY AND STEDFAST § Memorandum Opinion by Justice BAPTIST CHURCH, Appellees Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and Appellants’

argument—raised for the first time on appeal—that the trial court lacks subject matter

jurisdiction based on the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine.

For the reasons set forth in our memorandum opinion of even date herewith,

this court holds that Appellants’ first issue pertaining to the ecclesiastical abstention

doctrine should be sustained in part and overruled in part. Accordingly, it is ordered

that the trial court may properly exercise subject matter jurisdiction over this case;

provided, however, that the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine deprives the trial court of subject matter jurisdiction to hear defamation claims predicated on the following:

(1) any of Seth Bookout’s statements referring to Stedfast Baptist Church as a “cult”

or to Pastor Jonathan Shelley as a “cult leader” and (2) any of Bookout’s statements

referring to Shelley as a “sodomite” or similar statements by Bookout that according

to Shelley “suggest that [Shelley] engage[s] in sexual activities that are condemned by

the doctrines of [his] [c]hurch.”

This court further holds that there was no error in the trial court’s order

denying Appellants’ motion to dismiss. Accordingly, it is ordered that the trial court’s

order is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellants Bookout, Leslye Romero, and Ryan

Gallagher shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dabney Bassel Justice Dabney Bassel

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Seth Bookout, Leslye Romero, and Ryan Gallagher v. Jonathan Shelley and Stedfast Baptist Church, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seth-bookout-leslye-romero-and-ryan-gallagher-v-jonathan-shelley-and-texapp-2022.