Sessler v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Sessler v. State

56 N.E.2d 851, 222 Ind. 608, 1944 Ind. LEXIS 172

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 9, 1944

DocketNo. 28,009.

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 56 N.E.2d 851 (Sessler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sessler v. State, 56 N.E.2d 851, 222 Ind. 608, 1944 Ind. LEXIS 172 (Ind. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Richman, J.

The appellant upon a plea of guilty of contributing to the delinquency of a minor was fined five dollars and costs which she paid and given a suspended sentence of six months in Indiana Woman’s Prison. Over three months later and at a subsequent term she filed petition with affidavits attached to set aside the judgment and substitute a plea of not guilty for her former plea. The court granted a hearing at which affidavits and counteraffidavits were admitted and read in evidence and oral testimony was taken all of which is sought to be brought in the record by a bill of exceptions. All the evidence is abstracted in appellant’s brief. -

The petition filed after the term was too late. State ex rel. Thomas v. Murray, Judge (1942), 219 Ind. 461, 39 N. E. (2d) 450. If the petition be treated as a petition for writ of error coram nobis the same result must be reached. The evidence was conflicting on every material issue. The matter was within the trial court’s discretion and his conclusion as to the weight of the conflicting evidence will not be disturbed. Garrett v. State (1939), 216 Ind. 52, 22 N. E. (2d) 981.

Judgment affirmed.

Note.—Reported in 56 N. E. (2d) 851.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richman, J.

The appellant upon a plea of guilty of contributing to the delinquency of a minor was fined five dollars and costs which she paid and given a suspended sentence of six months in Indiana Woman’s Prison. Over three months later and at a subsequent term she filed petition with affidavits attached to set aside the judgment and substitute a plea of not guilty for her former plea. The court granted a hearing at which affidavits and counteraffidavits were admitted and read in evidence and oral testimony was taken all of which is sought to be brought in the record by a bill of exceptions. All the evidence is abstracted in appellant’s brief. -

The petition filed after the term was too late. State ex rel. Thomas v. Murray, Judge (1942), 219 Ind. 461, 39 N. E. (2d) 450. If the petition be treated as a petition for writ of error coram nobis the same result must be reached. The evidence was conflicting on every material issue. The matter was within the trial court’s discretion and his conclusion as to the weight of the conflicting evidence will not be disturbed. Garrett v. State (1939), 216 Ind. 52, 22 N. E. (2d) 981.

Judgment affirmed.

Note.—Reported in 56 N. E. (2d) 851.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 N.E.2d 851, 222 Ind. 608, 1944 Ind. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sessler-v-state-ind-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack