Sessions v. Wenz

244 A.D. 762

This text of 244 A.D. 762 (Sessions v. Wenz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sessions v. Wenz, 244 A.D. 762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law and the facts and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum. We are unable to determine upon what theory the verdict is founded. If founded upon the theory of ownership of the motor car by the defendant and responsibility under section 59 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, the finding that the defendant was the owner of the car was contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. (See Tryon v. Willbank, 234 App. Div. 335, and Perham v. Cottle, 98 Misc. 48; affd., 178 App. Div. 949.) All concur. (The judgment was for damages in an automobile negligence case. The order denied a motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perham v. Cottle
178 A.D. 949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)
Tryon v. Willbank
234 A.D. 335 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
Perham v. Cottle
98 Misc. 48 (New York Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 A.D. 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sessions-v-wenz-nyappdiv-1935.