Sessions v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Sessions v. State

563 So. 2d 62, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 176, 1990 WL 68602

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedMarch 30, 1990

Docket2 Div. 718

StatusPublished

This text of 563 So. 2d 62 (Sessions v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sessions v. State, 563 So. 2d 62, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 176, 1990 WL 68602 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

PATTERSON, Judge.

This cause was remanded by the Alabama Supreme Court for consideration in light of Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255, 109 S.Ct. 1038, 103 L.Ed.2d 308 (1989). The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, because the issue raised by appellant concerning the seizure of contraband lacks merit. Appellant’s issues concerning the trial court’s failure to charge the jury on his constitutional right not to take the stand and the trial court’s failure to answer a question from the jury during its deliberations are procedurally barred because appellant made no objection at trial.

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

PATTERSON, Judge.

This cause was remanded by the Alabama Supreme Court for consideration in light of Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255, 109 S.Ct. 1038, 103 L.Ed.2d 308 (1989). The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, because the issue raised by appellant concerning the seizure of contraband lacks merit. Appellant’s issues concerning the trial court’s failure to charge the jury on his constitutional right not to take the stand and the trial court’s failure to answer a question from the jury during its deliberations are procedurally barred because appellant made no objection at trial.

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

563 So. 2d 62, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 176, 1990 WL 68602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sessions-v-state-alacrimapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack