Sessions v. National Surety Co.

79 S.W.2d 164
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 31, 1935
DocketNo. 2564
StatusPublished

This text of 79 S.W.2d 164 (Sessions v. National Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sessions v. National Surety Co., 79 S.W.2d 164 (Tex. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

WALKER, Chief Justice.

This is a companion case with C. B. Pair-child v. National Surety Company et al. (Tex. Civ. App.) 79 S.W.(2d) 162, in which National Surety Company remained a defendant. On identical facts with the Fairchild Case, pleas of privilege were filed by' all the defendants, the National Surety Company with prayer that the cause of action as to it be transferred to Dallas County, and prayers by the other defendants as in the Fairchild Case. The same order must be made as to the state of Texas and Standifer Bros, as •made in the Fairchild Case, with the further order that the ease as to National Surety Company be transferred to Dallas county.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fairchild v. National Surety Co.
79 S.W.2d 162 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 S.W.2d 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sessions-v-national-surety-co-texapp-1935.