Home/Supreme Court of Vermont/Sessions v. Gilbert

Sessions v. Gilbert

1 Brayt. 75
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided July 1, 1816·Published

Opinion

4 general receipt in full of all demands, cannot be explained [76] or impeached, by parol testimony; mistake or fraud would b.e pause for admitting parol testimony to do away its effects.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sessions v. Gilbert, 1 Brayt. 75 (Vt. 1816).

1 Brayt. 75 (Sessions v. Gilbert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.