Sessions v. Connecticut

Second Circuit

Sessions v. Connecticut

404 F.2d 342

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 21, 1968·No. No. 179, Docket 32594·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff, a former administrative assistant to the Director of the Connecticut State Welfare Department, appeals from the dismissal of his declaratory judgment action to review the constitutionality of the Connecticut Merit System Act, Title 5, Conn.Gen.Stat. (Rev.1958) and from the denial of his request for a three-judge court to hear the case. The gravamen of his complaint is that his constitutional rights were infringed by the application of the procedures resulting in his dismissal pursuant to Title 5, supra.

We affirm on Judge Clarie’s opinion below, D.C., 293 F.Supp. 834.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff, a former administrative assistant to the Director of the Connecticut State Welfare Department, appeals from the dismissal of his declaratory judgment action to review the constitutionality of the Connecticut Merit System Act, Title 5, Conn.Gen.Stat. (Rev.1958) and from the denial of his request for a three-judge court to hear the case. The gravamen of his complaint is that his constitutional rights were infringed by the application of the procedures resulting in his dismissal pursuant to Title 5, supra.

We affirm on Judge Clarie’s opinion below, D.C., 293 F.Supp. 834.

Affirmed.

Sessions v. Connecticut, 404 F.2d 342 (2d Cir. 1968).

Pincite

404 F.2d 342 (Sessions v. Connecticut) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related