Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sesler v. State

Sesler v. State

675 So. 2d 713, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6852, 1996 WL 354623
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 28, 1996
DocketNo. 96-1099
StatusPublished

This text of 675 So. 2d 713 (Sesler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sesler v. State, 675 So. 2d 713, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6852, 1996 WL 354623 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The summary denial of the defendant’s Rule 3.850 motion seeking a belated appeal based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel in failing to file a timely notice of appeal is reversed and remanded for the trial court to either attach portions of the record which conclusively refute the defendant’s claim or hold an evidentiary hearing to determine the merits of the claim. Stephenson v. State, 655 So.2d 86 (Fla.1995); State v. District Court of Appeal, First District, 569 So.2d 439 (Fla. 1990).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, HARRIS and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Dist. Ct. of Appeal, First Dist.
569 So. 2d 439 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Stephenson v. State
655 So. 2d 86 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
675 So. 2d 713, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6852, 1996 WL 354623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sesler-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.