Seskey v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-3174
DOUGLAS R. SESKEY,
Petitioner,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,
Respondent.
Joseph J. Chester, Caplan & Chester, of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, argued for petitioner.
Michael A. Carney, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief were B. Chad Bungard, General Counsel, Rosa M. Koppel, Deputy General Counsel, and Calvin M. Morrow, Acting Associate General Counsel.
Appealed from: United States Merit Systems Protection Board NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the Merit Systems Protection Board
in CASE NO(S). PH0752060402-I-1.
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (BRYSON, Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and LINN, Circuit Judge.)
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R.36
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED: December 7, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Seskey v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Seskey v. Merit Systems Protection Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.