Sesan v. Yandel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sesan v. Yandel

29 A.D.2d 526, 286 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2701

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 19, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 526 (Sesan v. Yandel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sesan v. Yandel, 29 A.D.2d 526, 286 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2701 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered July 10, 1967, and judgment, entered July 19, 1967, unanimously modified on the law, to the extent of reducing the recovery by plaintiff to the sum of $2,916.62; partial summary judgment granted to plaintiff in such amount; action severed as to balance of plaintiff’s alleged claim, with remand for trial thereof; and order and judgment otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements to either party. The record discloses an issue of fact as to the balance owing to plaintiff for the period covered by the alleged account stated in that an issue is presented as to whether the account was stated under a failure, due to mistake, to credit the defendant with one monthly payment of $416.66. Concur — Botein, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Tilzer and McGivern, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered July 10, 1967, and judgment, entered July 19, 1967, unanimously modified on the law, to the extent of reducing the recovery by plaintiff to the sum of $2,916.62; partial summary judgment granted to plaintiff in such amount; action severed as to balance of plaintiff’s alleged claim, with remand for trial thereof; and order and judgment otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements to either party. The record discloses an issue of fact as to the balance owing to plaintiff for the period covered by the alleged account stated in that an issue is presented as to whether the account was stated under a failure, due to mistake, to credit the defendant with one monthly payment of $416.66. Concur — Botein, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Tilzer and McGivern, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 526, 286 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sesan-v-yandel-nyappdiv-1967.