S.E.S. v. Grant County Dept. of Welfare

Indiana Supreme Court

S.E.S. v. Grant County Dept. of Welfare

594 N.E.2d 447, 1992 WL 143280

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJune 26, 1992

Docket27S05-9206-JV-499

StatusPublished

Cited by23 cases

This text of 594 N.E.2d 447 (S.E.S. v. Grant County Dept. of Welfare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S.E.S. v. Grant County Dept. of Welfare, 594 N.E.2d 447, 1992 WL 143280 (Ind. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

KRAHULIK, Justice.

S.E.S. - (Respondent-Appellant - below) ("'Mother") seeks transfer after the Court of Appeals affirmed the termination of her parental rights. S.E.S. v. Grant County Dept. of Pub. Welf. (1991), Ind.App., 582 N.E.2d 886.

Mother argues that before her parental rights may be terminated, Ind. Code § 31-6-1-1(5) requires that the agency seeking termination show that the agency provided reasonable services to assist the parent in fulfilling her parental obligations. Mother contends that, because her alcoholism was a cause of her inability to properly parent her children and the welfare department did not provide services aimed at treating her alcoholism, the termination of her parental rights was improper.

The Court of Appeals rejected this argument - because - Ind. Code § 81-6-5-4(c), which sets forth what elements the agency seeking parental termination must prove, no longer requires that the ageney provide services to the parent. 582 N.E.2d at 889. Mother claims that, despite the deletion of the requirement by the legislature from Ind. Code § 31-6-5-4(c), Indiana appellate courts have continued to read into the statute the requirement of reasonable services, and that the instant decision is in conflict with those cases. Mother cites the following cases: In the Matter of M.B. and C.B. v. Delaware County Dept. of Pub. Welf. (1991), Ind.App., 570 N.E.2d 78, 84; Matter of D.B. (1990), Ind.App., 561 N.E.2d 844, 848; and Matter of Campbell (1989), Ind.App., 584 N.E.2d 273, 276. Although we do not believe that those cases are necessarily in conflict with the opinion of the Court of Appeals here, we hold that to the extent those cases are interpreted as requiring the agency seeking termination of parental rights to plead and prove that services have been offered to the parent to assist in fulfilling parental obligations, such interpretation would be incorrect. No such requirement remains.

The Court of Appeals' opinion was correctly reasoned. Accordingly, we now grant transfer to resolve any perceived conflict in the opinions of the Court of Appeals as to requirements under Ind. Code § 31-6-5-4. We hereby adopt and incorporate by reference the opinion of the Court of Appeals pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rule 11.

SHEPARD, C.J., and DeBRULER, GIVAN and DICKSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

KRAHULIK, Justice.

S.E.S. - (Respondent-Appellant - below) ("'Mother") seeks transfer after the Court of Appeals affirmed the termination of her parental rights. S.E.S. v. Grant County Dept. of Pub. Welf. (1991), Ind.App., 582 N.E.2d 886.

Mother argues that before her parental rights may be terminated, Ind. Code § 31-6-1-1(5) requires that the agency seeking termination show that the agency provided reasonable services to assist the parent in fulfilling her parental obligations. Mother contends that, because her alcoholism was a cause of her inability to properly parent her children and the welfare department did not provide services aimed at treating her alcoholism, the termination of her parental rights was improper.

The Court of Appeals rejected this argument - because - Ind. Code § 81-6-5-4(c), which sets forth what elements the agency seeking parental termination must prove, no longer requires that the ageney provide services to the parent. 582 N.E.2d at 889. Mother claims that, despite the deletion of the requirement by the legislature from Ind. Code § 31-6-5-4(c), Indiana appellate courts have continued to read into the statute the requirement of reasonable services, and that the instant decision is in conflict with those cases. Mother cites the following cases: In the Matter of M.B. and C.B. v. Delaware County Dept. of Pub. Welf. (1991), Ind.App., 570 N.E.2d 78, 84; Matter of D.B. (1990), Ind.App., 561 N.E.2d 844, 848; and Matter of Campbell (1989), Ind.App., 584 N.E.2d 273, 276. Although we do not believe that those cases are necessarily in conflict with the opinion of the Court of Appeals here, we hold that to the extent those cases are interpreted as requiring the agency seeking termination of parental rights to plead and prove that services have been offered to the parent to assist in fulfilling parental obligations, such interpretation would be incorrect. No such requirement remains.

The Court of Appeals' opinion was correctly reasoned. Accordingly, we now grant transfer to resolve any perceived conflict in the opinions of the Court of Appeals as to requirements under Ind. Code § 31-6-5-4. We hereby adopt and incorporate by reference the opinion of the Court of Appeals pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rule 11.

SHEPARD, C.J., and DeBRULER, GIVAN and DICKSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

594 N.E.2d 447, 1992 WL 143280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ses-v-grant-county-dept-of-welfare-ind-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack