Service Merchandise Co. No. 46, Inc. v. Director of Revenue

748 S.W.2d 177, 1988 Mo. LEXIS 29, 1988 WL 21618
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided March 15, 1988·No. No. 69662·Published

Opinion

BLACKMAR, Judge.

The appellant conducts a merchandising business through catalog showrooms, including one in Missouri. It causes catalogs to be printed in Tennessee, Georgia, Minnesota, and Iowa, and mailed by the printer directly to prospective customers. The director sought to impose Missouri use tax on the contract price of the catalogs shipped to Missouri addresses. The Administrative Hearing Commission sustained the assessment.

The case is indistinguishable from May Department Stores, Inc. v. Director of Revenue, 748 S.W.2d 174 (Mo. banc 1988) (decided today). The appellant does not exercise the privilege of “storing, using, or consuming” the catalogs in Missouri, and so is not subject to Missouri use tax under § 144.610.1, RSMo 1968.

The decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission is reversed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Service Merchandise Co. No. 46, Inc. v. Director of Revenue, 748 S.W.2d 177, 1988 Mo. LEXIS 29, 1988 WL 21618 (Mo. 1988).

748 S.W.2d 177 (Service Merchandise Co. No. 46, Inc. v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

May Department Stores Co. v. Director of Revenue
748 S.W.2d 174 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1988)