Service Corporation International and SCI Texas Funeral Services, Inc. Jointly Doing Business as and Under the Assumed Name of Valley Memorial Gardens Octavio Padilla, and Daniel Garza v. Virginia Martinez
This text of Service Corporation International and SCI Texas Funeral Services, Inc. Jointly Doing Business as and Under the Assumed Name of Valley Memorial Gardens Octavio Padilla, and Daniel Garza v. Virginia Martinez (Service Corporation International and SCI Texas Funeral Services, Inc. Jointly Doing Business as and Under the Assumed Name of Valley Memorial Gardens Octavio Padilla, and Daniel Garza v. Virginia Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-18-00568-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL AND SCI TEXAS FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. JOINTLY D/B/A VALLEY MEMORIAL GARDENS, OCTAVIO PADILLA, AND DANIEL GARZA, Appellants,
v.
VIRGINIA MARTINEZ, ET AL., Appellees.
On Agreed Motion to Stay Appeal.
ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Hinojosa Order Per Curiam
This is an interlocutory appeal of an order, dated September 24, 2018, granting in
part and denying in part a motion to compel arbitration filed by appellants. The matter is before the Court on an “Agreed Motion to Stay Appeal” jointly filed by appellants and
appellees. The parties represent in the motion that the defendants have filed a second
motion to compel arbitration in the trial court which addresses new parties and claims;
that the arbitrability issues in that motion are substantively similar to the issues in the
current appeal; and that the trial court has set the pending motion for a hearing on
February 27, 2019. The parties ask us to stay the appeal for sixty days to conserve the
Court’s and the parties resources, as the trial court’s rulings on the pending motion may
be reviewable in the instant appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 29.6(a)(1).
Having reviewed the parties’ motion and the record, this Court is of the opinion that
the motion is meritorious and should be granted. Accordingly, we hereby GRANT the
motion and ABATE the appeal for sixty (60) days or until further order of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 19th day of February, 2019.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Service Corporation International and SCI Texas Funeral Services, Inc. Jointly Doing Business as and Under the Assumed Name of Valley Memorial Gardens Octavio Padilla, and Daniel Garza v. Virginia Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/service-corporation-international-and-sci-texas-funeral-services-inc-texapp-2019.