Service Co. v. Black & Co.

132 S.E. 645, 35 Ga. App. 249, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 671
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 14, 1926
Docket17100
StatusPublished

This text of 132 S.E. 645 (Service Co. v. Black & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Service Co. v. Black & Co., 132 S.E. 645, 35 Ga. App. 249, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 671 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; the verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., coneurs. Bloodworth, J., not participating, on aeeount of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 S.E. 645, 35 Ga. App. 249, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/service-co-v-black-co-gactapp-1926.