Servero Alcorta v. W. Dawson Sterling, Sterling Investments, Inc., the Nature Conservancy, and the Nature Conservancy of Texas, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Servero Alcorta v. W. Dawson Sterling, Sterling Investments, Inc., the Nature Conservancy, and the Nature Conservancy of Texas, Inc.

DecidedSeptember 11, 2003

Docket13-03-00216-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Servero Alcorta v. W. Dawson Sterling, Sterling Investments, Inc., the Nature Conservancy, and the Nature Conservancy of Texas, Inc. (Servero Alcorta v. W. Dawson Sterling, Sterling Investments, Inc., the Nature Conservancy, and the Nature Conservancy of Texas, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Servero Alcorta v. W. Dawson Sterling, Sterling Investments, Inc., the Nature Conservancy, and the Nature Conservancy of Texas, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-03-216-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________________

SEVERO ALCORTA, ET AL., Appellants,

v.

W. DAWSON STERLING, ET AL., Appellees.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yanez, and Garza

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, SEVERO ALCORTA, ET AL., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2001-09-4237-E. After the record was filed, appellants filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellants state that this case has been resolved and appellants no longer wish to prosecute this appeal. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellants' unopposed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 11th day of September, 2003.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-03-216-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________________

SEVERO ALCORTA, ET AL., Appellants,

v.

W. DAWSON STERLING, ET AL., Appellees.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yanez, and Garza

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, SEVERO ALCORTA, ET AL., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2001-09-4237-E. After the record was filed, appellants filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellants state that this case has been resolved and appellants no longer wish to prosecute this appeal. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellants' unopposed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 11th day of September, 2003.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Servero Alcorta v. W. Dawson Sterling, Sterling Investments, Inc., the Nature Conservancy, and the Nature Conservancy of Texas, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/servero-alcorta-v-w-dawson-sterling-sterling-inves-texapp-2003.