Servano v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
This text of 32 F. App'x 980 (Servano v. Immigration & Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
There was no abuse of discretion in denying Mrs. Servano’s application for a deportation waiver, or Mr. Servano’s request for suspension of deportation.1 The adverse credibility determinations in the administrative proceedings were based on substantial evidence, and supported the finding that Mr. Servano could not establish good moral character, and that Mrs. Servano was not entitled to relief from deportation. See INS v. Yang, 519 U.S. 26, 30, 117 S.Ct. 350, 136 L.Ed.2d 288 (1996); Ramos v. INS, 246 F.3d 1264, 1265-66 (9th Cir.2001).
PETITION DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 F. App'x 980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/servano-v-immigration-naturalization-service-ca9-2002.