Seruya v. Seruya
This text of 171 A.D.2d 739 (Seruya v. Seruya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Leone, J.), dated September 22, 1989, which awarded the defendant wife the principal sum of $20,740 for arrears of temporary maintenance and child support. The plaintiffs notice of appeal from an order dated August 15, 1989, is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5520 [c]).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Absent any proof by the husband of the payments he allegedly made on the wife’s behalf in lieu of the $425 weekly payments of temporary maintenance and child support, there is no basis to overturn the judgment for arrears (cf., Yecies v Yecies, 108 AD2d 813). The husband is not entitled to a recalculation of the arrears merely because he submitted an inadequate defense to the wife’s application for leave to enter a money judgment for the arrears. Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 A.D.2d 739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seruya-v-seruya-nyappdiv-1991.