Serusa v. Serusa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Serusa v. Serusa

94 A.D.2d 979, 464 N.Y.S.2d 61, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18489

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 25, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 94 A.D.2d 979 (Serusa v. Serusa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Serusa v. Serusa, 94 A.D.2d 979, 464 N.Y.S.2d 61, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18489 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Motion granted and appeal dismissed as moot. Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from that part of an order which granted the defendant’s motion to amend the answer. The order also granted plaintiff’s cross motion to amend the complaint. The service of an amended complaint renders the appeal moot, since the defendant is now required to serve a new answer to the amended complaint (see 10 Carmody-Wait 2d, NY Prac, § 70:262). Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ. [Order entered May 20, 1983.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Motion granted and appeal dismissed as moot. Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from that part of an order which granted the defendant’s motion to amend the answer. The order also granted plaintiff’s cross motion to amend the complaint. The service of an amended complaint renders the appeal moot, since the defendant is now required to serve a new answer to the amended complaint (see 10 Carmody-Wait 2d, NY Prac, § 70:262). Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ. [Order entered May 20, 1983.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 A.D.2d 979, 464 N.Y.S.2d 61, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/serusa-v-serusa-nyappdiv-1983.