Serrante v. Moses & Singer LLP

137 A.D.3d 697, 27 N.Y.S.3d 855
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 31, 2016·No. 655 109014/11·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey K. Oing, J.), entered December 24, 2014, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive damages resulting from an alleged scheme by defendants to defraud the court in a prior action between plaintiff and defendant GJF (Serrante v GJF Constr. Corp., 72 AD3d 543 [1st Dept 2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 704 [2010]), and related enforcement proceedings, in which defendant Moses & Singer represented GJF. Defendants’ motion to dismiss was properly granted since the action is barred by the “ancient rule that the courts of this State will not entertain civil actions for damages arising from alleged subornation of perjury in a prior civil proceeding” (Newin Corp. v Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co., 37 NY2d 211, 217 [1975]).

We have considered plaintiff’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz, Kapnick and Kahn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Serrante v. Moses & Singer LLP, 137 A.D.3d 697, 27 N.Y.S.3d 855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

137 A.D.3d 697 (Serrante v. Moses & Singer LLP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bulbin v. O'Carroll
2019 NY Slip Op 4674 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
PIERONI, THOMAS J. v. PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP
140 A.D.3d 1707 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)