Serrano v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Serrano v. State

708 So. 2d 1031, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3649, 1998 WL 158601

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 8, 1998·No. No. 97-01632·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant asserts five grounds in support of his argument that his request for postconviction relief should have been granted. We find no merit in any issue raised by the appellant and affirm the trial court’s denial of postconviction relief. However, we find that the State is correct that there is a scrivener’s error in the appellant’s judgment; there is no indication of the basis for the adjudication of guilt. The judgment should show that the appellant was tried and found guilty by a jury. We herewith amend the judgment to correct this error. In all other respects, we affirm.

PARKER, C.J., CAMPBELL, J., and LENDERMAN, JOHN C., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant asserts five grounds in support of his argument that his request for postconviction relief should have been granted. We find no merit in any issue raised by the appellant and affirm the trial court’s denial of postconviction relief. However, we find that the State is correct that there is a scrivener’s error in the appellant’s judgment; there is no indication of the basis for the adjudication of guilt. The judgment should show that the appellant was tried and found guilty by a jury. We herewith amend the judgment to correct this error. In all other respects, we affirm.

PARKER, C.J., CAMPBELL, J., and LENDERMAN, JOHN C., Associate Judge, concur.

Serrano v. State, 708 So. 2d 1031, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3649, 1998 WL 158601 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

708 So. 2d 1031 (Serrano v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related