Serrano v. State
This text of 708 So. 2d 1031 (Serrano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant asserts five grounds in support of his argument that his request for postconviction relief should have been granted. We find no merit in any issue raised by the appellant and affirm the trial court’s denial of postconviction relief. However, we find that the State is correct that there is a scrivener’s error in the appellant’s judgment; there is no indication of the basis for the adjudication of guilt. The judgment should show that the appellant was tried and found guilty by a jury. We herewith amend the judgment to correct this error. In all other respects, we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
708 So. 2d 1031, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3649, 1998 WL 158601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/serrano-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.