Serrano v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Serrano v. State

633 So. 2d 1115, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1251, 1994 WL 51828

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 22, 1994

DocketNo. 92-1624

StatusPublished

This text of 633 So. 2d 1115 (Serrano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Serrano v. State, 633 So. 2d 1115, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1251, 1994 WL 51828 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendant Rnben Serrano from (1) judgments of conviction for two counts of aggravated battery [§ 784.-045(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1991)], and (2) consecutive sentences of thirty-years imprisonment on each count imposed as a habitual violent felony offender [§ 775.084(l)(b), (4)(b)(2), Fla.Stat. (1991) ]. Contrary to the defendant’s sole point on appeal, we conclude that there was an abundance of direct evidence adduced at trial establishing that the defendant unjustifiably attacked the two victims in this case with a deadly weapon, to wit: a razor blade, in violation of Section 784.-045(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1991). No reversible error is shown by this point on appeal, and, accordingly, the judgments of conviction and sentences under review are, in all respects,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendant Rnben Serrano from (1) judgments of conviction for two counts of aggravated battery [§ 784.-045(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1991)], and (2) consecutive sentences of thirty-years imprisonment on each count imposed as a habitual violent felony offender [§ 775.084(l)(b), (4)(b)(2), Fla.Stat. (1991) ]. Contrary to the defendant’s sole point on appeal, we conclude that there was an abundance of direct evidence adduced at trial establishing that the defendant unjustifiably attacked the two victims in this case with a deadly weapon, to wit: a razor blade, in violation of Section 784.-045(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1991). No reversible error is shown by this point on appeal, and, accordingly, the judgments of conviction and sentences under review are, in all respects,

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

633 So. 2d 1115, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1251, 1994 WL 51828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/serrano-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.