Serrano v. Holder
This text of 328 F. App'x 460 (Serrano v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Pro se petitioners Enrique Deloya Serrano, Emigdia Sorroza Cruz, Erick Enrique Deloya Sorroza and Cristhian Yona-than Deloya Sorroza, natives and citizens of Mexico, seek review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order denying their second motion to reopen removal proceedings as numerically barred. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.
Petitioners do not challenge the Board’s determination that their second motion to reopen exceeded the number limit. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(A); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). Because the motion is number-barred, we deny the petition for review, and we need not address petitioners’ remaining challenges.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
328 F. App'x 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/serrano-v-holder-ca9-2009.