Serra v. Benitez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Serra v. Benitez

69 A.D.3d 863, 891 N.Y.2d 912

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 19, 2010

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 69 A.D.3d 863 (Serra v. Benitez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Serra v. Benitez, 69 A.D.3d 863, 891 N.Y.2d 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

“The extent to which the noncustodial parent may exercise parenting time is a matter committed to the sound discretion of [864]*864the hearing court, to be determined on the basis of the best interests of the child” (Chamberlain v Chamberlain, 24 AD3d 589, 592 [2005]). The Family Court’s determination regarding visitation was not an improvident exercise of its discretion (cf. Chamberlain v Chamberlain, 24 AD3d at 592). Covello, J.E, Angiolillo, Balkin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

“The extent to which the noncustodial parent may exercise parenting time is a matter committed to the sound discretion of [864]*864the hearing court, to be determined on the basis of the best interests of the child” (Chamberlain v Chamberlain, 24 AD3d 589, 592 [2005]). The Family Court’s determination regarding visitation was not an improvident exercise of its discretion (cf. Chamberlain v Chamberlain, 24 AD3d at 592). Covello, J.E, Angiolillo, Balkin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 A.D.3d 863, 891 N.Y.2d 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/serra-v-benitez-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack