Serowitz v. Zweifach
99 N.Y.S. 1149
This text of 99 N.Y.S. 1149 (Serowitz v. Zweifach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Serowitz v. Zweifach, 99 N.Y.S. 1149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).
Opinion
The case was tried by the justice without a jury. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff and against the defendants upon conflicting evidence, and the questions of fact were decided in favor of the plaintiff. The claim that the justice presiding at the trial was disqualified is without merit. The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
99 N.Y.S. 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/serowitz-v-zweifach-nyappterm-1906.