Serota v. Town of Brookhaven

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Serota v. Town of Brookhaven

102 A.D.2d 889, 477 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19115

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 25, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 102 A.D.2d 889 (Serota v. Town of Brookhaven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Serota v. Town of Brookhaven, 102 A.D.2d 889, 477 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19115 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action, inter alia, to declare the zoning ordinance of the Town of Brookhaven unconstitutional as applied to plaintiff’s property, the parties cross-appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Geiler, J.), dated August 8, 1983, which so declared and directed the appellants-respondents to rezone the subject property. I Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. 11 Upon our examination of the testimony and exhibits, including the photographs of the subject property and surrounding neighborhood, we find that Special Term correctly concluded that plaintiff’s property has been rendered useless under its present zoning classification (cf. Stevens v Town of Huntington, 20 NY2d 352). Gibbons, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action, inter alia, to declare the zoning ordinance of the Town of Brookhaven unconstitutional as applied to plaintiff’s property, the parties cross-appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Geiler, J.), dated August 8, 1983, which so declared and directed the appellants-respondents to rezone the subject property. I Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. 11 Upon our examination of the testimony and exhibits, including the photographs of the subject property and surrounding neighborhood, we find that Special Term correctly concluded that plaintiff’s property has been rendered useless under its present zoning classification (cf. Stevens v Town of Huntington, 20 NY2d 352). Gibbons, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 A.D.2d 889, 477 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/serota-v-town-of-brookhaven-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack