Serota v. Strauss
This text of 141 A.D.2d 531 (Serota v. Strauss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for defamation, the plaintiff Irving Serota appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Wager, J.), dated March 24, 1987, as denied those branches of his motion which were for summary judgment on the claims for defamation.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
We agree with the Supreme Court that there exist triable issues of fact regarding the defendant’s defenses to the defamation claims asserted by the appellant which preclude the granting of summary judgment. Bracken, J. P., Brown, Lawrence and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
141 A.D.2d 531, 529 N.Y.S.2d 714, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/serota-v-strauss-nyappdiv-1988.