Serota v. Serota
Opinion
Action to rescind and cancel a contract. Resettled order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out the first and third defenses contained in defendant’s answer modified by adding thereto the following after the word “ denied ” in the second ordering paragraph; “ without [919]*919prejudice upon the trial to a determination in reference to the third affirmative defense as to whether the facts presented constitute a complete or a partial defense.” As thus modified, the order, in so far as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
258 A.D. 918 (Serota v. Serota) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.