Sermons v. State
685 So. 2d 81, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13271, 1996 WL 729761
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s convictions, but remand with directions to correct the written judgment and sentence to conform to the oral pronouncement of the trial court. See Willis v. State, 656 So.2d 261 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). The trial court orally imposed concurrent life sentences for counts I and II, together with a concurrent 30-year sentence for count III. However, the written judgment and sentence reflects the imposition of three concurrent life terms. Appellant need not be present at resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sermons v. State, 685 So. 2d 81, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13271, 1996 WL 729761 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
685 So. 2d 81 (Sermons v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Willis v. State
656 So. 2d 261 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)