Serling v. Serling
137 A.D. 930
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1910
StatusPublished
This text of 137 A.D. 930 (Serling v. Serling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Serling v. Serling, 137 A.D. 930 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).
Opinion
— Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., Who dissented, upon'the ground that Israel Serling was not a superintendent nor exercising acts of superintendence at the time of the accident.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
137 A.D. 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/serling-v-serling-nyappdiv-1910.