Serlested's case

1 N.C. 202

Opinion

Whitlock, J.

It is well enough under the statute 11 H. 7.

2. It is said, he pretended to have power to discharge soldiers; which is impossible, for it appears by the statute that he had no such power: but the captain or general has. Therefore the indictment is bad.

Curia. It is this, that makes the deceit. He pretending to have a power, which he had not.

3. It is said that he did not discharge him at tunc et ibidem, viz. the time and place where the money was taken; perhaps he discharged him at some other time.

Curia, pleads this, if yon please. The indictment is well enough.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Serlested's case, 1 N.C. 202 (circtnc 1793).

1 N.C. 202 (Serlested's case) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.