Serio v. United States

392 U.S. 305, 88 S. Ct. 2063, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1111, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1366
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 10, 1968·No. 200 M·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Black dissents. Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968). Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Serio v. United States, 392 U.S. 305, 88 S. Ct. 2063, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1111, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1366 (1968).

392 U.S. 305 (Serio v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Grindstaff
479 F. Supp. 599 (E.D. Tennessee, 1978)
John A. Hutter Et Ux. v. Bernard J. Korzen, Etc
409 U.S. 905 (Supreme Court, 1972)
People v. Thomas
190 N.W.2d 250 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1971)
United States v. Stanley Aaron Headrick
407 F.2d 384 (Sixth Circuit, 1969)
United States v. Sims
297 F. Supp. 1009 (W.D. Tennessee, 1968)