Serino v. Lipper

New York Court of Appeals

Serino v. Lipper

10 N.Y.3d 930

New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 26, 2008·Published

Opinion

10 N.Y.3d 930 (2008)

MATTHEW SERINO et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs,
v.
KENNETH LIPPER et al., Defendants,
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP, Respondent, and ABRAHAM BIDERMAN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted May 12, 2008. Decided June 26, 2008.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

10 N.Y.3d 930 (2008)

MATTHEW SERINO et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs,
v.
KENNETH LIPPER et al., Defendants,
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP, Respondent, and ABRAHAM BIDERMAN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted May 12, 2008. Decided June 26, 2008.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Serino v. Lipper, 10 N.Y.3d 930 (N.Y. 2008).

Pincite

10 N.Y.3d 930 (Serino v. Lipper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

MATTHEW SERINO et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. KENNETH LIPPER et al., Defendants, PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP, Respondent, and ABRAHAM BIDERMAN, Appellant.

MATTHEW SERINO et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs,
v.
KENNETH LIPPER et al., Defendants,
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP, Respondent, and ABRAHAM BIDERMAN, Appellant.