Sergio Sierra v. Lago Viejo South Homeowners Association, Inc. and William F. Kimball, Trustee

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 12, 2009
Docket13-08-00135-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Sergio Sierra v. Lago Viejo South Homeowners Association, Inc. and William F. Kimball, Trustee (Sergio Sierra v. Lago Viejo South Homeowners Association, Inc. and William F. Kimball, Trustee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sergio Sierra v. Lago Viejo South Homeowners Association, Inc. and William F. Kimball, Trustee, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-08-00135-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

SERGIO SIERRA, Appellant,



v.



LAGO VIEJO SOUTH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,

INC. AND WILLIAM F. KIMBALL, TRUSTEE, Appellees.

____________________________________________________________



On appeal from the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

______________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



The appellant's brief in the above cause was originally due on July 25, 2008. The appellant has previously requested and received four prior extensions of time, granting the appellant until October 19, 2008, to file the brief. On January 15, 2009, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. No response has been received from appellant.

Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).



PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 12th day of March, 2009.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sergio Sierra v. Lago Viejo South Homeowners Association, Inc. and William F. Kimball, Trustee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sergio-sierra-v-lago-viejo-south-homeowners-associ-texapp-2009.