Sergio Nava v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: September 2, 2015
• Docket: 05-15-01028-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed August 31, 2015.

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-01028-CR No. 05-15-01029-CR

SERGIO NAVA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F15-51825-M, F15-51826-M

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Lang, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Schenck Sergio Nava pleaded guilty to possession of heroin in an amount less than one gram and

possession of methamphetamine in an amount less than one gram. Pursuant to a plea agreement

in each case, the trial court sentenced appellant to one year’s confinement in a state jail facility.

Appellant waived his right to appeal as part of the agreements. See Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d

218, 219–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). The trial court certified both that appellant does not have

the right to appeal and that appellant waived his right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a), (d);

Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.

/David J. Schenck/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47

151028F.U05

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

SERGIO NAVA, Appellant On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-15-01028-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F15-51825-M. Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Bridges and Lang participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 31st day of August, 2015.

–3– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

SERGIO NAVA, Appellant On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-15-01029-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F15-51826-M. Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Bridges and Lang participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

–4–